If what matters in the mind is hidden even from us, why does civilization make us unhappy, and is there a way out?
32 claims from this lecture, in the order Marci Shore makes them, with the 32 terms it leans on and its 18 links to other lectures.
The first of these displeasing propositions of psycho-analysis is this: that mental processes are essentially unconscious and that those which are conscious are merely isolated acts and parts of the whole psychic entity.
Sigmund Freud, Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. The epigraph Shore gives this lecture.
By number of claims in this lecture.
Shore’s own judgments and connections
The 5 claims the lecture spends most time on.
What matters in the mind happens below awareness: Freud holds that "mental processes are essentially unconscious," with conscious ones only scattered fragments of the whole.
Freud's self is a structure whose parts only make sense together: two vertical layers, unconscious beneath conscious, cut across by three horizontal parts, id, ego and superego.
Put simply Freud pictures the self as parts that only make sense together: an unconscious layer beneath a conscious one, crossed by three parts, the "id" (desire), the "ego" (the I) and the "superego" (conscience).
The id is desire itself, unconscious, divided into two hardwired drives Freud posits like geometric axioms rather than proves: Eros, toward love and pleasure; Thanatos, toward aggression and death.
Put simply Freud: the "id" is desire itself, and unconscious. It has two inborn drives that he assumes rather than proves: Eros, toward love and pleasure, and Thanatos, toward aggression and death.
In the text In The Ego and the Id (1923; Riviere translation), ch. IV, Freud writes of "two classes of instincts, one of which, Eros or the sexual instincts," and calls the other the death instinct.
Psychic energy behaves like matter: it can be shifted or sublimated but never discarded, so repressed desires return in another guise and blocked aggression turns on the self.
Put simply Freud: mental energy behaves like matter. It can be moved or redirected but never thrown away, so pushed-down desires come back in another form, and blocked aggression turns against oneself.
Civilization is bought with repression of both drives: to live together people must curb sex and aggression alike, which is why society and individual fulfillment pull against each other.
Put simply Freud: civilization is paid for by holding back both our basic drives. To live together, people must curb sex and aggression alike, which is why society and personal fulfillment pull against each other.
Read down to follow the lecture. The time opens that minute on YouTube.
Revolutionaries build the new order with "hands still withered by the cross of despotism": formed by the old regime, its makers can never be pure.
Put simply Robespierre: revolutionaries build the new order with "hands still withered by the cross of despotism". Shaped by the old regime, the people building the new one can never be pure.
Shore reads the Bolshevik project as Enlightenment perfectibility taken literally: engineer new human beings whose consciousness merges so completely with History that no separate subjectivity remains.
Put simply Shore: the Bolsheviks took literally the Enlightenment belief that people can be perfected. They tried to engineer new humans whose minds merged so fully with History's march that no separate self remained.
What stays metaphysical in Hegel, the "I that is a We," the Soviets tried to realize as literally as they could: any subjectivity diverging from the collective must be purged.
Put simply Shore: Hegel's "I that is a We," the self merged with the community, stays abstract in his philosophy. The Soviets tried to make it literally real: any inner life differing from the collective had to be purged.
A line in Zamyatin's dystopia We runs "We comes from God, I comes from the devil": the I is to be overcome and swallowed by the collective.
Where the Soviet take on Hegel's I and we privileges the we, Freud flips the order: he begins with the single I, split into conscious and unconscious, reaching society afterward.
Put simply Shore's contrast: the Soviet reading of Hegel puts the group ("we") before the individual ("I"). Freud reverses this. He starts from the single self, split into conscious and unconscious, and reaches society afterward.
Freud is in many ways Marx's opposite pole yet asks a very similar question: both are theorists of modernity, trying to explain why modern life leaves people so miserable.
Put simply Shore: Freud is in many ways Marx's opposite, yet he asks much the same question. Both try to explain why modern life leaves people so miserable.
Mental life is treated more as a thing in itself: once an imagined event can make someone ill, the psyche is no mere by-product of biology or chemistry.
Put simply Freud: if something merely imagined can make a person ill, the mind must be treated more as real in its own right, not as a mere by-product of biology or chemistry.
In his first theory of hysteria, the illness traces back to repressed trauma from childhood, usually sexual; the buried memory resurfaces disguised as a neurotic symptom.
Put simply Freud's first theory of "hysteria": the illness comes from a childhood trauma, usually sexual, pushed out of awareness. The buried memory comes back in disguise, as a nervous symptom.
For Freud, neurosis and psychosis lie on one continuum of repression, differing in degree; Shore draws the consequence that everyone is mentally ill, since nobody lacks repressed trauma.
Put simply Freud: milder disorders ("neurosis") and severe ones ("psychosis") differ only in degree, both coming from repression. Shore draws the conclusion that everyone is mentally ill, since nobody lacks repressed trauma.
In the text In "Neurosis and Psychosis" (1924; Riviere translation), Freud writes that "Neurosis is the result of a conflict between the ego and its id", and psychosis of a like disturbance between the ego and the outer world.
The cure is nothing but talk: the analysand speaks uncensored, the analyst coaxes fragments of the unconscious out through the cracks, and symptoms become manageable rather than magically fixed.
Put simply Freud's cure is only talk: the patient speaks freely, without self-censoring, and the analyst draws bits of the unconscious out through the cracks. Symptoms become manageable, not magically cured.
What matters in the mind happens below awareness: Freud holds that "mental processes are essentially unconscious," with conscious ones only scattered fragments of the whole.
For Freud, sexual life begins in infancy, though sexual here means far more than genital intercourse: desire in an expansive sense.
For Freud we are formed very young: childhood, reaching back to birth itself, is the formative time, and it is necessarily traumatic.
Nearly every child goes through an Oedipal phase: love shifts from breast to mother, the father becomes a rival, and a flickering wish for his death is quickly buried.
Put simply Freud: nearly every child goes through an "Oedipal" phase. The child's love moves from the breast to the mother, the father becomes a rival, and a fleeting wish for his death is quickly pushed out of mind.
Picture the unconscious as a dark psychic closet: whatever the conscious mind cannot bear gets shoved in, the pile grows for a lifetime, and nothing is ever thrown out.
Put simply Paul Robinson pictures Freud's unconscious as a dark closet: whatever the conscious mind cannot bear gets shoved in, the pile grows for a lifetime, and nothing is ever thrown out.
Freud's self is a structure whose parts only make sense together: two vertical layers, unconscious beneath conscious, cut across by three horizontal parts, id, ego and superego.
Put simply Freud pictures the self as parts that only make sense together: an unconscious layer beneath a conscious one, crossed by three parts, the "id" (desire), the "ego" (the I) and the "superego" (conscience).
The id is desire itself, unconscious, divided into two hardwired drives Freud posits like geometric axioms rather than proves: Eros, toward love and pleasure; Thanatos, toward aggression and death.
Put simply Freud: the "id" is desire itself, and unconscious. It has two inborn drives that he assumes rather than proves: Eros, toward love and pleasure, and Thanatos, toward aggression and death.
In the text In The Ego and the Id (1923; Riviere translation), ch. IV, Freud writes of "two classes of instincts, one of which, Eros or the sexual instincts," and calls the other the death instinct.
The superego is conscience rather than consciousness: an inner voice that constantly tells you you are bad, a source of guilt and also society internalized.
Put simply Freud: the "superego" is conscience, not awareness. It is the inner voice always telling you that you are bad, a source of guilt, and society's rules taken inside you.
The ego's job is to negotiate, every moment, between an id that wants and a superego that forbids; since they barely admit compromise, misery is built into the self.
Put simply Freud: the "ego" must negotiate every moment between the id, which wants, and the superego, which forbids. Since the two barely allow compromise, misery is built into the self.
Shore recalls Arendt remarking that had Freud not spent his days among German-speaking Habsburg Jews in Vienna reading Goethe and Shakespeare, the Oedipus complex might never have reached the rest of us.
Psychic energy behaves like matter: it can be shifted or sublimated but never discarded, so repressed desires return in another guise and blocked aggression turns on the self.
Put simply Freud: mental energy behaves like matter. It can be moved or redirected but never thrown away, so pushed-down desires come back in another form, and blocked aggression turns against oneself.
For Freud, belief in God is infantile: once the growing child sees his father is neither immortal nor all-powerful, he transfers his longing for an omnipotent protector onto a deity.
Civilization is bought with repression of both drives: to live together people must curb sex and aggression alike, which is why society and individual fulfillment pull against each other.
Put simply Freud: civilization is paid for by holding back both our basic drives. To live together, people must curb sex and aggression alike, which is why society and personal fulfillment pull against each other.
Joining the Enlightenment debate, Freud grants that the state of nature is genuinely free and liberating, but that freedom comes with a great deal of violence and aggression.
Put simply Freud: life before organized society (the "state of nature") really is free and liberating, but that freedom comes with a great deal of violence and aggression.
Human aggression is a standing threat to any society, so living together means constantly suppressing it; the hostility we cannot aim at others gets turned back on ourselves.
Put simply Freud: human aggression is a constant threat to any society, so living together means always holding it down. The hostility we cannot aim at others gets turned back on ourselves.
Society trades happiness, not just Hobbes's liberty, for security: the pleasure principle, what the id craves, cannot be squared with the reality principle people need in order to coexist.
Put simply Freud: Hobbes said society trades freedom for security; Freud says it trades happiness. What our desires crave (the "pleasure principle") cannot be squared with what living together requires (the "reality principle").
Civilization, Freud writes, is largely "constantly created anew": every individual entering society must in turn give up instinctual satisfaction for the community's sake.
Put simply Freud: civilization is rebuilt in every generation, because each new person joining society must give up some satisfaction of their drives for the good of the community.
On Shore's analogy, sexuality does for Freud what property does for Marx, and guilt does what power will do for Foucault: pervasive, dispersed, latent in every relationship.
Put simply Shore's comparison: sexuality is to Freud what property is to Marx. And guilt is to Freud what power will be to Foucault: present everywhere, spread out, hidden in every relationship.
Against the Marxists, who expect aggressive instincts to fade once conditions change, Freud insists aggression is hardwired and older than private property, so no social rearrangement removes it.
Where to read it Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents, ch. V.
We can never fully know ourselves: what is most basic in us sits in the unconscious, so the self stays opaque to itself and permanently at odds with itself.
Put simply Freud: we can never fully know ourselves. What is most basic in us lies in the unconscious, so the self stays hidden from itself and always at odds with itself.
Psychoanalysis theorizes life once God is dead: having thrown him out, we hunt for windows to climb back in, torn between craving authority and wanting to undermine it.
Put simply Yurko Prokhasko, a psychoanalyst and friend of Shore's: psychoanalysis is a theory of life after we reject God. Having thrown him out, we look for windows to crawl back in, torn between craving authority and wanting to undermine it.
Shore's closing contrast: unlike Marxism, psychoanalysis offers no exit; it may ease some symptoms, but no reordering of society can promise a happy ending.
20 of these 32 first come up in this lecture. Definitions are our paraphrase.
Where a claim here answers an earlier lecture, and where a later lecture answers a claim here. “Our inference” marks a link Shore does not state outright.
HobbesHobbes's state of nature means permanent war: greed, self-interest and the appetite for power and wealth set everyone against everyone, in unending terror. L2 · 19:29
FreudJoining the Enlightenment debate, Freud grants that the state of nature is genuinely free and liberating, but that freedom comes with a great deal of violence and aggression. L9 · 42:58
A violent state of nature; happiness traded for security, as in Hobbes
RousseauRousseau's natural human was virtuous and compassionate; property and society made people vain, selfish and competitive, and there is no road back to that lost condition. L2 · 32:02
FreudJoining the Enlightenment debate, Freud grants that the state of nature is genuinely free and liberating, but that freedom comes with a great deal of violence and aggression. L9 · 42:58
Society still costs us our nature, but nature was violent, not virtuous
MarxFor Marx, your place in the socioeconomic structure, the base, determines your thinking; consciousness, culture and art, the superstructure, derive from it. L5 · 46:02
FreudAgainst the Marxists, who expect aggressive instincts to fade once conditions change, Freud insists aggression is hardwired and older than private property, so no social rearrangement removes it. L9 · 47:30
Aggression is innate, not a product of social position; Marxists neglect Thanatos
MarxFor Marx, religion is a drug for the masses, dangled before the exploited so that a promised reward in the next world reconciles them to suffering in this one. L5 · 45:14
FreudFor Freud, belief in God is infantile: once the growing child sees his father is neither immortal nor all-powerful, he transfers his longing for an omnipotent protector onto a deity. L9 · 40:14
Religion as illusion that consoles, now traced to infantile wishes
FreudWhat matters in the mind happens below awareness: Freud holds that "mental processes are essentially unconscious," with conscious ones only scattered fragments of the whole. L9 · 22:57
LuxemburgHistory's logic runs ahead of those living it: "the unconscious comes before the conscious." Against Lenin, Luxemburg argues that history's stages must be respected and that party leaders turn conservative. L8 · 31:31
Shore says Luxemburg in 1904 was already hinting at the conscious/unconscious dualism Freud develops, though she identifies the unconscious with objective history.
FreudThe cure is nothing but talk: the analysand speaks uncensored, the analyst coaxes fragments of the unconscious out through the cracks, and symptoms become manageable rather than magically fixed. L9 · 22:51
BretonSurrealism swings somewhat back toward Freud: psychic automatism, a free association of the mind released from every aesthetic or moral consideration. L10 · 45:00
Shore says surrealism becomes "a little more Freudian" with free association and psychic automatism.
FreudWe can never fully know ourselves: what is most basic in us sits in the unconscious, so the self stays opaque to itself and permanently at odds with itself. L9 · 48:02
KafkaGregor Samsa's waking as a "monstrous vermin" in The Metamorphosis forces the question of whether any stable self exists, or identity is only a mask with nothing underneath to grip. L10 · 13:37
Shore calls Gregor's waking from unsettling dreams very Freudian and ties the story's unstable self to what Freud tells us about subjectivity.
FreudWe can never fully know ourselves: what is most basic in us sits in the unconscious, so the self stays opaque to itself and permanently at odds with itself. L9 · 48:02
ShoreOn Shore's admittedly simplified schema, modernism answers modernity's uncertainty in two waves: a Freudian plunge into the self, then an avant-garde that vaults past it, almost a Hegelian Aufheben. L10 · 3:21
Shore characterizes first-wave modernism as a basically Freudian turn inward toward what is dark, hidden and not rational.
FreudWe can never fully know ourselves: what is most basic in us sits in the unconscious, so the self stays opaque to itself and permanently at odds with itself. L9 · 48:02
HusserlWhere Freud locates the essential self in what is most hidden, the transcendental ego is pure light: nothing in it stays concealed, and knowing is a matter of clear seeing. L11 · 45:42
Keeps a radical theory of subjectivity but flips the depth from hidden to transparent, all light.
FreudWhat matters in the mind happens below awareness: Freud holds that "mental processes are essentially unconscious," with conscious ones only scattered fragments of the whole. L9 · 22:57
SartreAgainst Freud, consciousness cannot be cleanly cut into an opaque unconscious and a transparent conscious half; the whole of it is translucent, neither one nor the other. L13 · 43:50
Rejects the split into an opaque unconscious and a conscious part: consciousness is translucent
FreudCivilization is bought with repression of both drives: to live together people must curb sex and aggression alike, which is why society and individual fulfillment pull against each other. L9 · 42:17
MarcuseWhere Freud saw repression as the unavoidable cost of living together, Marcuse sees an exit: the repression that matters is capitalism's, and its hold on the body might be undermined. L14 · 40:22
Civilization's repression is not permanent: capitalism's specific repression can be overcome
FreudThe id is desire itself, unconscious, divided into two hardwired drives Freud posits like geometric axioms rather than proves: Eros, toward love and pleasure; Thanatos, toward aggression and death. L9 · 32:50
MarcuseEros and Thanatos compete for the same space, and the death drive can only occupy ground eros has vacated; so work rearranged to re-eroticize the body shrinks aggression. L14 · 40:37
Shore calls Eros and Civilization a takeoff on Freud, using eros and Thanatos to find the way out that Freud denies.
FreudFor Freud, neurosis and psychosis lie on one continuum of repression, differing in degree; Shore draws the consequence that everyone is mentally ill, since nobody lacks repressed trauma. L9 · 19:15
ReichEvery neurosis has its root in sexual repression: Freud's claim pushed to the extreme, with libido treated as a literal physical energy, orgone, that can be stored in a box. L14 · 32:14
Neurosis from sexual repression, pushed to a literal, physical libido
FreudThe id is desire itself, unconscious, divided into two hardwired drives Freud posits like geometric axioms rather than proves: Eros, toward love and pleasure; Thanatos, toward aggression and death. L9 · 32:50
BeauvoirBeauvoir finds Freud as reductive as Marx: psychoanalysis swaps existential choice for hardwired drives and involuntary repression, a determinism she cannot accept, however seriously she takes sexuality. L16 · 42:11
Hardwired drives and repression are too deterministic; they crowd out existential choice
FreudWhat matters in the mind happens below awareness: Freud holds that "mental processes are essentially unconscious," with conscious ones only scattered fragments of the whole. L9 · 22:57
Lévi-StraussCulture, taken broadly to include language, art, customs, tools and belief, operates largely unconsciously, a Freudian premise; anthropology's task is to expose the deep laws beneath it. L19 · 40:15
Takes Freud's premise that most mental life, and so culture, is unconscious
FreudCivilization is bought with repression of both drives: to live together people must curb sex and aggression alike, which is why society and individual fulfillment pull against each other. L9 · 42:17
GirardFor Girard, the founding moment of civilization is a collective murder: the group experiences "a supremely evil and then beneficent being," and that experience cannot help gripping it. L20 · 39:03
Civilization rests on violence: for Girard an actual founding murder, for Freud repressed aggression.
FreudHuman aggression is a standing threat to any society, so living together means constantly suppressing it; the hostility we cannot aim at others gets turned back on ourselves. L9 · 43:03
GirardThe mob's fundamental misattribution: it shifts its own violence onto the victim, who is then taken to have been its cause. L20 · 40:09
Violence is thrown outward onto a victim rather than turned inward and repressed
FreudWe can never fully know ourselves: what is most basic in us sits in the unconscious, so the self stays opaque to itself and permanently at odds with itself. L9 · 48:02
DerridaSpeech cannot guarantee presence, because the one speaking is not necessarily present even to himself; so presence versus absence, like speech versus writing, is a binary to be dismantled. L22 · 22:10
Shore points to Freud in Derrida's claim that the speaking self is not present to itself: the self is hidden from the self.
Throughlines that pass through this lecture.
As they come up in the lecture.
Freud born in a small Moravian town in the Habsburg Empire.
Freud's family moves to Vienna when he is almost four, as restrictions on Jews are lifted.
Freud marries Martha, aged 30 (six children, including Anna).
Freud first uses the term "psychoanalysis".
The Interpretation of Dreams Die Traumdeutung
What Is to Be Done? Что делать?
Freud appointed associate professor at the University of Vienna.
Organizational Questions of Russian Social Democracy
Vienna Psychoanalytic Society convened.
Freud's University of Vienna lectures, published 1917 as Introductory Lectures, popularize psychoanalysis during World War I.
Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse
We Мы
Lenin dies of a stroke, leading to the Trotsky-Stalin power struggle.
Zamyatin's dystopian novel We (basis for Orwell's 1984).
Civilization and Its Discontents Das Unbehagen in der Kultur
Anschluss in March 1938; Freud leaves Vienna for Paris, then London.
Freud dies weeks after the outbreak of World War II, after asking his physician for morphine.
An Outline of Psycho-Analysis Abriss der Psychoanalyse
Trotsky killed with an ice axe in Mexico by one of Stalin's agents.