← Throughlines of Modern ThoughtTimeline · Network · Throughlines
A term · 3 claims · lectures 5, 9

History

History treated as a quasi-autonomous, directional force with its own dialectical forward momentum, not merely the record of past events.

The 3 claims that turn on it

In lecture order, as Marci Shore presents each view. The time opens that minute of the lecture on YouTube.

Lecture 5Marxism

With Hegel, History acquires a capital H: in the Hegelian sense it is a phenomenon of its own, with a dialectical forward motion.

Put simply Hegel: History, with a capital H, becomes a force of its own, not just a record of what happened. It moves forward through clashes between opposites.

Lecture 9Freudian Psychoanalysis

Shore reads the Bolshevik project as Enlightenment perfectibility taken literally: engineer new human beings whose consciousness merges so completely with History that no separate subjectivity remains.

Put simply Shore: the Bolsheviks took literally the Enlightenment belief that people can be perfected. They tried to engineer new humans whose minds merged so fully with History's march that no separate self remained.

What stays metaphysical in Hegel, the "I that is a We," the Soviets tried to realize as literally as they could: any subjectivity diverging from the collective must be purged.

Put simply Shore: Hegel's "I that is a We," the self merged with the community, stays abstract in his philosophy. The Soviets tried to make it literally real: any inner life differing from the collective had to be purged.

The questions it belongs to

Throughlines that pass through one of these claims.

1 of its claims

Related terms

Terms that appear in the same claims.

social perfectibilityThe Enlightenment idea that we can know, control and reshape the world, and people, toward perfection.
the new man / engineers of human soulsThe Bolshevik project of re-engineering people so subjectivity is perfectly identified with History; writers and intellectuals serve as "engineers of human souls."
Geist
Geist (Spirit)The whole of collective, historical life in which individuals gain meaning: "the I that is a we, the we that is an I."
totalitarianismAs Shore defines it: a regime with draconian ideology and absolute truth-claims, a messianic movement, institutions of terror, monopolies on communication and force, a panopticon state, and erased public/private line.