← Throughlines of Modern ThoughtTimeline · Network · Throughlines
A term · 5 claims · lectures 12, 13, 16, 17, 22

Thrownness

Geworfenheit

Dasein finds itself already cast into a time, place and situation it did not choose, with no vantage point before or outside it.

The 5 claims that turn on it

In lecture order, as Marci Shore presents each view. The time opens that minute of the lecture on YouTube.

Lecture 12Heideggerean Existentialism

Dasein's condition is thrownness (Geworfenheit): it lands, with a kind of violence, in a time and place it never chose, with no before and no outside from which to consent.

Put simply Heidegger: we are "thrown" into existence. Each of us lands, with a kind of violence, in a time and place we never chose, with no earlier moment or outside spot from which we could have agreed to it.

Lecture 13French Existentialism

Sartre shifts Heidegger's thrownness toward abandonment: we find ourselves dumped in a world without God, forlorn, with nothing either inside us or outside us to rely on.

Put simply Heidegger said we are "thrown" into a world we did not choose. Sartre stresses being abandoned there: no God, nobody to turn to, nothing inside or outside us to rely on.

Lecture 16The Second Sex

Nobody chooses from a blank slate: a person decides what to become "on the basis of what he has been," starting inside a world and a past already given.

Put simply Beauvoir: nobody starts from a blank slate. A person decides what to become "on the basis of what he has been", inside a world and a past that are already given.

Lecture 17Husserl's Children, Searching for the Other

Nobody is thrown into an empty world. For Heidegger, other people belong to Dasein's situation from the outset, so existing in the world already means existing alongside others.

Put simply Heidegger: you never start out alone. From the moment you exist, other people are already part of your world.

Lecture 22French Post-Structuralism: Derrida and Deconstruction

Derrida's opening question on writing echoes Heidegger twice: needing a preliminary idea of writing before asking where it begins is the hermeneutic circle, and "always already" is Heidegger's phrase.

Put simply Shore hears Heidegger twice in Derrida. To ask where writing begins, you must already have some idea of what writing is: Heidegger's "hermeneutic circle." And "always already" is Heidegger's phrase.

Related terms

Terms that appear in the same claims.

délaissement
abandonment (délaissement)Sartre's inflection of thrownness: we are placed in the world and left there, with no God and nothing to lean on.
en-soi / pour-soi
facticity and transcendence (in-itself / for-itself)Facticity is the given of one's situation and past; transcendence is consciousness going beyond it. Shore places them close to Sartre's in-itself and for-itself.
Mitsein / Mitwelt
Being-with (Mitsein, Mitwelt)Dasein's world is always shared: to be in the world is to be with other beings, not a solitary subject.
In-der-Welt-Sein / immer schon
being-in-the-world / always alreadyDasein is never outside the world looking in; it is always already involved in it, using things and living among others.
hermeneutischer Zirkel
hermeneutic circleTo pose a question we must already stand inside some preliminary understanding of what it asks about.