← Throughlines of Modern ThoughtTimeline · Network · Throughlines
A term · 4 claims · lectures 2, 11, 12, 21

Cogito, ergo sum

"I think, therefore I am": the one certainty radical doubt cannot dissolve, since doubting itself proves a thinking self exists.

The 4 claims that turn on it

In lecture order, as Marci Shore presents each view. The time opens that minute of the lecture on YouTube.

Lecture 2The Heritage of the Enlightenment

DescartesL2 · 15:49Core idea

Even if a demon has planted every thought in my head, the thinking itself is happening, so I must exist: "cogito, ergo sum."

Put simply Descartes: even if a demon had put every thought in my head, I would still be thinking, so I must exist. Hence "cogito, ergo sum": I think, therefore I am.

Lecture 11Phenomenology

Modern philosophy's basic trouble is that it has no ground to stand on. The remedy is Descartes' experiment: discard everything you think you know and ask what survives as certain.

Put simply Husserl: modern philosophy's basic problem is that it has nothing solid to build on. The fix is Descartes' experiment: throw out everything you think you know and ask what you can still be certain of.

Lecture 12Heideggerean Existentialism

Descartes starts from thinking and Husserl from thinking about an object; Heidegger starts from existing. That I am comes before anything I think: being precedes knowing.

Lecture 21Power and Archaeology - Michel Foucault

Descartes's cogito, Husserl's transcendental ego, Heidegger's Dasein, Sartre's radical freedom: each keeps an indubitable self at the center, and Foucault's early work revolts against that sovereign subject.

Put simply Foucault's early work rebels against the "sovereign subject": the self that philosophers from Descartes to Husserl, Heidegger and Sartre kept at the center as the one thing beyond doubt.

The questions it belongs to

Throughlines that pass through one of these claims.

Related terms

Terms that appear in the same claims.

radical (Cartesian) doubtDescartes's method of rejecting as false anything not incontrovertibly certain, to find an absolutely solid foundation for knowledge.
Bodenlosigkeit
groundlessnessThe modern fear that nothing is given or certain: a thrilling yet unbearable freedom for the avant-garde, philosophy's missing foundation for Husserl.
ontology / epistemology
ontology vs. epistemologyOntology asks what it is to be; epistemology asks what we can know. Heidegger insists the former comes first.
decentering of the subject (structuralist anti-humanism)The individual human subject is not the origin or holder-together of meaning; structures and language are primary, and subjects are produced by them.
transzendentales Ich / empirisches Ich
transcendental ego vs. empirical egoThe empirical ego is the contingent, worldly self with its own history. The transcendental ego is the pure subject left after the epoché, the source of all sense the world has for me. In the lecture, a universal "I-ness" in everyone.
Dasein
Dasein (being-there)Heidegger's word for human existence, replacing "subject" and "consciousness": the entity for whom its own being is at issue.