signifiant / signifié
The two faces of a linguistic sign: the sound-image that signifies and the concept signified; together they form the sign.
In lecture order, as Marci Shore presents each view. The time opens that minute of the lecture on YouTube.
Proper study of language brackets the signified, the real cat the word points to, and examines how signs work as a system at one moment.
Put simply Saussure: to study language properly, set aside the real things words point to, such as the actual cat. Look instead at how words work together as a system at a given moment.
In the text In the Course in General Linguistics (1916; Baskin translation, p. 66), Saussure writes: "The linguistic sign unites, not a thing and a name, but a concept and a sound-image."
As Shore reports the structuralists, language need not voice or mirror a meaning already present: it produces that meaning, and signs structure the way we think.
Put simply Shore's account of the structuralists: language does not just express or mirror meanings that already exist. It creates meaning, and words shape how we think.
Any given sign draws its meaning from the signifiers it is not, which are absent; so language turns on absence more than on presence.
Put simply Derrida: a word gets its meaning from all the words it is not ("cat" is not "bat" or "hat"), and those are absent. So language depends more on what is missing than on what is there.
A sign can only be a stable unity if something anchors it: an arche or transcendental signified that fixes the signifier-signified gap as absolute and irreducible.
Put simply Derrida: a word could keep one fixed meaning only if something outside language anchored it, a first origin or ultimate meaning (a "transcendental signified") that ties word and meaning together for good.
Links from these claims to others in the course. Each shows the earlier claim, then the later one that answers it. “Our inference” marks a link Shore does not state outright.
SaussureProper study of language brackets the signified, the real cat the word points to, and examines how signs work as a system at one moment. L19 · 25:13
ShoreBracketing subject and object alike and studying only how signifiers interact is structuralism's own route past the bridge problem of how subject reaches world. L19 · 47:26
Shore reads the structuralist bracketing of the signified through Husserlian bracketing, widening it to subject and object.
DerridaA sign can only be a stable unity if something anchors it: an arche or transcendental signified that fixes the signifier-signified gap as absolute and irreducible. L22 · 27:53
DerridaNot only is God dead; so is every would-be successor. History, Man, the Self, any transcendental signified: none exists to ground meaning or hold a system together. L22 · 28:52
If a stable sign needs an absolute foundation, denying any such foundation removes the sign's guaranteed unity.
SaussureNothing natural or God-given ties a signifier to its signified: the word dog refers to dogs only by differing from cat and hog, and by sheer convention. L10 · 20:22
DerridaAny given sign draws its meaning from the signifiers it is not, which are absent; so language turns on absence more than on presence. L22 · 22:36
If meaning comes from differences, it depends more on what is absent than presentOur inference
Terms that appear in the same claims.