← Throughlines of Modern ThoughtTimeline · Network · Throughlines
A term · 4 claims · lectures 10, 19

Bracketing

Formalists set aside what words refer to and study how language works in itself; Shore compares the move to Husserl's bracketing.

Put something in parentheses and set it aside.

The image Shore uses for it, in our paraphrase.

The 4 claims that turn on it

In lecture order, as Marci Shore presents each view. The time opens that minute of the lecture on YouTube.

Lecture 10Modernism and the Avant-Garde

ShklovskyL10 · 27:25

Literary language is special in announcing itself as language: it pulls attention toward the signifier, laying bare its devices, rather than acting as an invisible camera trained on the signified.

Put simply Shklovsky: the language of literature is special because it draws attention to itself as language and shows how it works. It points you to the words themselves, rather than acting as an invisible camera on the thing described.

Lecture 19Structuralism and Anthropology

ShoreL19 · 8:58Core idea

Structuralism responds to problems that preoccupied earlier thinkers, teleology and subjectivity, by diminishing both: in some ways it brackets history and the subject.

Put simply Shore: earlier thinkers worried about where history is heading and about the individual self. Structuralism handles both by making them matter less; in a way it sets history and the self aside.

SaussureL19 · 25:13

Proper study of language brackets the signified, the real cat the word points to, and examines how signs work as a system at one moment.

Put simply Saussure: to study language properly, set aside the real things words point to, such as the actual cat. Look instead at how words work together as a system at a given moment.

In the text In the Course in General Linguistics (1916; Baskin translation, p. 66), Saussure writes: "The linguistic sign unites, not a thing and a name, but a concept and a sound-image."

ShoreL19 · 47:26Core idea

Bracketing subject and object alike and studying only how signifiers interact is structuralism's own route past the bridge problem of how subject reaches world.

Put simply Shore: philosophy long asked how the mind can reach the world outside it. Structuralism sidesteps the question by setting aside both mind and world and studying only how signs relate to one another.

The questions it belongs to

Throughlines that pass through one of these claims.

Related terms

Terms that appear in the same claims.

linguistic structuralismMeaning lives in differences within a system, not in things; the background that let avant-gardists detach words from referents.
остранение
ostranenie (defamiliarization, estrangement)Making the familiar strange by laying bare the device, so perception wakes from automatized recognition into real seeing.
signifiant / signifié
signifier and signifiedThe two faces of a linguistic sign: the sound-image that signifies and the concept signified; together they form the sign.
synchronie / diachronie
synchrony vs. diachronySynchronic analysis studies a language as a system at one moment; diachronic analysis studies its change over time. Saussure treats them as distinct fields.
telosThe end or goal a thing is already developing toward, e.g. the seed is "aiming" at the apple it will become.
decentering of the subject (structuralist anti-humanism)The individual human subject is not the origin or holder-together of meaning; structures and language are primary, and subjects are produced by them.
the problem of the bridgeThe epistemological puzzle of how a subject enclosed in its own head can reach an independently existing object or outside world.