← Throughlines of Modern ThoughtTimeline · Network · Throughlines
A term · 4 claims · lectures 3, 4

Being vs. becoming

Sein / Werden

Whether identity and history are a fixed state to be understood (being) or an open, self-created process (becoming); Romantics prize becoming.

The 4 claims that turn on it

In lecture order, as Marci Shore presents each view. The time opens that minute of the lecture on YouTube.

Lecture 3The Legacy of Romanticism

RousseauL3 · 17:39Core idea

Two things distinguish humans from other creatures, on Rousseau's account: free agency, and an openness to becoming. We are underdetermined, self-creating beings rather than finished ones.

Put simply Rousseau: two things set humans apart from other creatures. We act freely, and we are open to becoming something new. Nothing fully fixes what we will be; we make ourselves.

A distinction Shore calls key and expects to keep returning: the Enlightenment asks how things are, what it is to be; the Romantics care about becoming, what we can become.

Put simply Shore calls this a key distinction she will keep returning to: the Enlightenment asks how things are; the Romantics ask what we can become. Being versus becoming.

FichteL3 · 37:08Core idea

Fichte: "to be free is nothing, to become free is heaven." Freedom is not a state you have but a becoming you live, driven by desire.

Lecture 4Hegel and the Historicist Chronotope

Like the Romantics, Hegel cares less about what is than about what is becoming: nothing holds still, and everything is always on its way to being something else.

Related terms

Terms that appear in the same claims.

volo ergo sum (vs. cogito ergo sum)
primacy of the willGrounding subjectivity in desire and will rather than cognition: "I will, therefore I am" replacing Descartes's "I think, therefore I am."