The condition after the last efforts to replace God are given up: no whole, no stable meaning, subject or direction, and general destabilization.
In lecture order, as Marci Shore presents each view. The time opens that minute of the lecture on YouTube.
Shore reads structuralism as the final big school to try standing in for God; with postmodernism the attempt is simply given up.
Postmodernity, Shore says, is often defined through its fervent anti-Hegelianism: against Hegel's "the true is the whole," it denies any whole, order, stable meaning, subject or direction.
Put simply Shore: postmodernity is often defined by its fierce rejection of Hegel. Hegel said "the true is the whole"; postmodern thought denies there is any whole, order, stable meaning, self or direction.
Foucault, in Shore's placement, sits on the threshold: no longer quite a structuralist, but not as radically post-structuralist as Derrida.
Shore reads postmodernism as a late answer to the century's mass killing: a vow of never again that reexamines the revolutionary tradition and concedes something in it went wrong.
Marx wrote "all that is solid melts into air" somewhat before its time: false in 1848, it describes what postmodernism brings about.
Postmodernity, which Bauman names liquid modernity, abandons the search for sturdier solids altogether and welcomes what is fluid, slippery and short-lived instead.
Put simply Bauman calls postmodernity "liquid modernity": people stop trying to replace old foundations with firmer ones and embrace what is fluid, slippery and short-lived instead.
Links from these claims to others in the course. Each shows the earlier claim, then the later one that answers it. “Our inference” marks a link Shore does not state outright.
MarxMarx's phrase "all that is solid melts into air" names the dissolution of everything that once seemed fixed and permanent. L25 · 34:12
ShoreMarx wrote "all that is solid melts into air" somewhat before its time: false in 1848, it describes what postmodernism brings about. L25 · 34:12
Shore reads Marx's line as untimely for 1848 and as truly describing postmodernism.
Throughlines that pass through one of these claims.
Terms that appear in the same claims.